For a much richer experience, download our iPhone App!


Download

Close Message
  • http://theryancox.com Ryan Cox

    This was a really good post Doug. Men lie, Women lie, Numbers don’t. So from your numbers, I’d say you’re spot on — and more importantly, non-consumer-facing companies should consider this approach. I’m coming into the office a couple days next week and working — I’d love to dig deeper on this. (PS: I’m 2 weeks into learning on teamtreehouse.com. Somebodies decided to learn to write his own code. Let Mr. Coley know! He’ll get a kick out of it! HA

  • http://twitter.com/renaudjoly Renaud JOLY

    I agree 

    Authority and impact on related keywords are very important. Remember that Google Webmaster Tools only displays a part of ranking (1,000 keywords). 

  • Anonymous

    So did this content have adwords connected with it as well? In other words were you getting paid traffic from adwords and the organic listing was visible. I think adwords performs better when their is a corresponding organic listing visible. Given the choice people will click the premium add (when the other is visible) this causes adwords to be the traffic source and the numbers will paint organic as looking unimportant but the truth is the CTR would have been lower without those organic placements.
    Great thought inspiring post.

    • http://www.marketingtechblog.com Douglas Karr

      @ktatgenhorst:disqus  Nope, we don’t do any paid search to acquire traffic.

  • http://mikeseidle.com indymike

    Doug, your last bit of advice, chase traffic, not rankings is exactly what most people do not get. Sometimes I think it is because rankings are easy, traffic is hard and conversions, be it ad clicks, leads or sales is even harder.

  • Tod Hirsch

    Hi Doug, I liked this post but I had a comment regarding your definition of SERP rankings for this article. If your position is that Google SERP personalization has made a common definition of Google “ranking” irrelevant, what definition of ranking are you using for this study? In other words, you’re making a claim that 72% of your traffic is coming from keywords you don’t even rank for on the 1st page of Google SERPs,  but if everyone’s personalized, who’s Google SERPs are you talking about? *Someone* is finding your blog for those keywords, right? And the chances that they’re searching on Page 2,3,4 etc of the Google SERPs are low. So for them, you ARE ranking on the 1st page, otherwise they probably wouldn’t find you in the great numbers you’re talking about. 

    • http://www.marketingtechblog.com Douglas Karr

      Actually, that’s not the case Tod.  As the article shows, the majority of the search traffic I’m getting is  NOT coming from my placement on the first page.  My point isn’t that ranking is NOT important…. my point is that RELEVANCE is much more important THAN ranking.  If you focus your content and write great content, people will find you.  Regardless of rank.

      We are also seeing this with our clients.  High volume, high ranking keywords are driving some traffic but not conversions.  Conversions are coming from highly relevant pages and posts from long-tail keywords are from SERP placements outside of the first page.  Again, relevance over rank.

  • Tod Hirsch

    Doug, your article was very clear that 72% of your traffic is NOT coming from queries where you rank on Page 1 of the SERPs. My question is more around the concept of “ranking” in the age of SERP personalization.  72% of your organic search traffic found you…somehow. How are they finding you if you’re not ranking on Page 1 for those queries?  Has SERP personalization come so far that everyone’s Page 1 is so very different?

    • http://www.marketingtechblog.com Douglas Karr

      To an extent… Some of our clients are seeing half of visits from personalized search. But this isn’t personalized search… This data came from Webmasters. This is people that ARE clicking past page 1 looking for a RELEVANT result.
      Douglas Karr

      • Tod Hirsch

        I always was under the impression that when people don’t find what they want on Page 1, they simply re-query, asking the question in a different way, rather than going to Page 2. That’s what I’ve always heard and in fact that’s what I always do.  If what you’re saying is true, people’s search behavior is changing quite radically. 

        • http://www.marketingtechblog.com Douglas Karr

          Tod – that’s definitely how I do searches. But it never ceases to amaze me how other people search.  For example: Many, many, many people type entire sentences into search engines rather than just a few keywords.  We’ve worked with our clients on developing FAQs that capture a ton of searches.  Who knew?!

  • Bill_Wilson34

    Doug, I really like the article. My mantra has always been customers first content second. If your content is appealing to your customers they will always find you.

  • http://www.blogbloke.com/ Blog Bloke

    Agreed.  

    Most of my traffic comes from pillar posts that I’ve written years ago. The long tail provides me with a regular stream of traffic day after day. The term “pillar post” has been somewhat abused over time. When I say “pillar post” I mean writing bonafied original content that is relevant to my site niche and fills a real need to the community. Not just curating content like some do. Being the first to fill that need established my content with Googebot as THE authority on the topic. 

    Good post Doug.

    BB

    • http://www.marketingtechblog.com Douglas Karr

      Thanks @blogbloke:disqus ! Always nice to get a compliment from one of the pioneers. :)

Mobile Theme