<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 3 Essential Requirements for any Web Application</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingtechblog.com/2008/07/01/requirements-for-web-applications/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingtechblog.com/2008/07/01/requirements-for-web-applications/</link>
	<description>new media strategies and other marketing gems</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Oscar</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingtechblog.com/2008/07/01/requirements-for-web-applications/#comment-166513</link>
		<dc:creator>Oscar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 01:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.douglaskarr.com/?p=2369#comment-166513</guid>
		<description>100% agree with you Doug, about API. and Agency feature... Excelent idea!. Web Applicantions = Future
Success!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">100% agree with you Doug, about API. and Agency feature&#8230; Excelent idea!. Web Applicantions = Future<br />
Success!</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patric Welch</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingtechblog.com/2008/07/01/requirements-for-web-applications/#comment-166029</link>
		<dc:creator>Patric Welch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 13:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.douglaskarr.com/?p=2369#comment-166029</guid>
		<description>I would absolutely love the Agency Feature. I maintain a ton of domains and would love to know that the actual domain is registered in my client's name yet I can still have 100% control of the management of the domain for them. I think clients would love this as well as it eliminates the fear that consultants can blackmail them with their own domain name if the relationship between them gets ugly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">I would absolutely love the Agency Feature. I maintain a ton of domains and would love to know that the actual domain is registered in my client&#8217;s name yet I can still have 100% control of the management of the domain for them. I think clients would love this as well as it eliminates the fear that consultants can blackmail them with their own domain name if the relationship between them gets ugly.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingtechblog.com/2008/07/01/requirements-for-web-applications/#comment-165990</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 12:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.douglaskarr.com/?p=2369#comment-165990</guid>
		<description>Doug

Your idea of the agency feature for domain registration is brilliant. That is exactly what I need for one of my projects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">Doug</p>
<p>Your idea of the agency feature for domain registration is brilliant. That is exactly what I need for one of my projects.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
