<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Emails not getting through? Add an SPF record!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingtechblog.com/2008/04/30/sender-policy-framework-spf-record/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingtechblog.com/2008/04/30/sender-policy-framework-spf-record/</link>
	<description>new media strategies and other marketing gems</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 00:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Getting Removed from Comcast&#8217;s Blacklist &#124; The Marketing Technology Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingtechblog.com/2008/04/30/sender-policy-framework-spf-record/#comment-177866</link>
		<dc:creator>Getting Removed from Comcast&#8217;s Blacklist &#124; The Marketing Technology Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 00:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.douglaskarr.com/?p=2197#comment-177866</guid>
		<description>[...] written in the past what steps I&#8217;ve learned to ensure our site maintains a good reputation, but it&#8217;s still possible to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">[...] written in the past what steps I&#8217;ve learned to ensure our site maintains a good reputation, but it&#8217;s still possible to [...]</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt B.</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingtechblog.com/2008/04/30/sender-policy-framework-spf-record/#comment-111865</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 03:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.douglaskarr.com/?p=2197#comment-111865</guid>
		<description>The problem with SPF and Sender ID is essentially that it breaks email forwarding.  DomainKeys (and the standard that is now called DKIM) are the wave of the future, as far as most people are concerned; however, it is more difficult to deploy and validate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">The problem with SPF and Sender ID is essentially that it breaks email forwarding.  DomainKeys (and the standard that is now called DKIM) are the wave of the future, as far as most people are concerned; however, it is more difficult to deploy and validate.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
