<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Your Site Down? Database?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingtechblog.com/2008/04/24/site-monitoring-tools/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingtechblog.com/2008/04/24/site-monitoring-tools/</link>
	<description>new media strategies and other marketing gems</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 00:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Douglas Karr</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingtechblog.com/2008/04/24/site-monitoring-tools/#comment-111357</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Karr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.douglaskarr.com/?p=2183#comment-111357</guid>
		<description>Hi Hovhannes,

Those are definitely options and I actually do have a mon.itor.us account.  However, the usability of Pingdom as an application is much simpler.  I could not figure out how to do some of the checks using mon.itor.us.  It appears monitis is organized similarly.

Thanks!
Doug</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">Hi Hovhannes,</p>
<p>Those are definitely options and I actually do have a mon.itor.us account.  However, the usability of Pingdom as an application is much simpler.  I could not figure out how to do some of the checks using mon.itor.us.  It appears monitis is organized similarly.</p>
<p>Thanks!<br />
Doug</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hovhannes</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingtechblog.com/2008/04/24/site-monitoring-tools/#comment-111088</link>
		<dc:creator>Hovhannes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 03:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.douglaskarr.com/?p=2183#comment-111088</guid>
		<description>I just want to introduce 2 more services - free &lt;a href="http://mon.itor.us" rel="nofollow"&gt;mon.itor.us&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://monitis.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;premium monitis&lt;/a&gt; monitoring services. One of their advantage you can combine external page load monitoring with systems resource monitoring and be notified about low systems resource. Then you can really be proactive not only fixing but preventing a failure. Give it a try!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">I just want to introduce 2 more services - free <a href="http://mon.itor.us" rel="nofollow">mon.itor.us</a> and <a href="http://monitis.com" rel="nofollow">premium monitis</a> monitoring services. One of their advantage you can combine external page load monitoring with systems resource monitoring and be notified about low systems resource. Then you can really be proactive not only fixing but preventing a failure. Give it a try!</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ade</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingtechblog.com/2008/04/24/site-monitoring-tools/#comment-108302</link>
		<dc:creator>Ade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 14:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.douglaskarr.com/?p=2183#comment-108302</guid>
		<description>Great review Doug.  And you're dead right that just checking for HTTP port status is not enough.

We've been using Pingdom with &lt;a href="http://www.formspring.com"&gt;FormSpring&lt;/a&gt; for over a year and are happy with the service.  

We setup a similar check -- created about a dozen unit tests against the application using our API (e.g., can a form be submitted, can we see the expected data in the database, etc.) and output a PASS or FAIL status to a file.  Then Pingdom checks that file via HTTP to make sure that the message says PASS, else alerts go off like crazy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">Great review Doug.  And you&#8217;re dead right that just checking for HTTP port status is not enough.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve been using Pingdom with <a href="http://www.formspring.com">FormSpring</a> for over a year and are happy with the service.  </p>
<p>We setup a similar check &#8212; created about a dozen unit tests against the application using our API (e.g., can a form be submitted, can we see the expected data in the database, etc.) and output a PASS or FAIL status to a file.  Then Pingdom checks that file via HTTP to make sure that the message says PASS, else alerts go off like crazy.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amol Dalvi</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingtechblog.com/2008/04/24/site-monitoring-tools/#comment-108202</link>
		<dc:creator>Amol Dalvi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 11:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.douglaskarr.com/?p=2183#comment-108202</guid>
		<description>Thanks for that product review Doug. Please let me know how things go at the end of 30 days. That is about when we plan to put in our monitoring too.

Thanks,
Amol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">Thanks for that product review Doug. Please let me know how things go at the end of 30 days. That is about when we plan to put in our monitoring too.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Amol.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roland Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingtechblog.com/2008/04/24/site-monitoring-tools/#comment-108024</link>
		<dc:creator>Roland Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 04:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.douglaskarr.com/?p=2183#comment-108024</guid>
		<description>I was also surprised at the prices of some of the monitoring services and the fees they were charging. Pingdom looks to be a good service. I settled on AlertBot (about the same price) almost a year ago and have been pleased with their service. Since you do all of the setup yourself and everything else is automatic from there on, $50 per month should be buying an incredible basket of services.

I'm looking for some of these monitoring services to include a Twitter interface for notifications in the near future. Using Twitter so that any number of people could "follow" the alerts would be an excellent capability, in my opinion.
Thanks!
Roland Smith
http://www.techmatters.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">I was also surprised at the prices of some of the monitoring services and the fees they were charging. Pingdom looks to be a good service. I settled on AlertBot (about the same price) almost a year ago and have been pleased with their service. Since you do all of the setup yourself and everything else is automatic from there on, $50 per month should be buying an incredible basket of services.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m looking for some of these monitoring services to include a Twitter interface for notifications in the near future. Using Twitter so that any number of people could &#8220;follow&#8221; the alerts would be an excellent capability, in my opinion.<br />
Thanks!<br />
Roland Smith<br />
<a href="http://www.techmatters.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.techmatters.com/</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
