<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Follow up on Browser Market Share from Colts.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marketingtechblog.com/2007/08/27/follow-up-on-browser-market-share-from-coltscom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marketingtechblog.com/2007/08/27/follow-up-on-browser-market-share-from-coltscom/</link>
	<description>new media strategies and other marketing gems</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 01:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Data Governance</title>
		<link>http://marketingtechblog.com/2007/08/27/follow-up-on-browser-market-share-from-coltscom/comment-page-1/#comment-56649</link>
		<dc:creator>Data Governance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 14:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingtechblog.com/2007/08/27/follow-up-on-browser-market-share-from-coltscom/#comment-56649</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this post!  All i've seen to date are stats from technology heavy sites, thus the users are probably more likely to have a high resolution and another browser besides IE.  I'd like to see what the avg screen resolution on colts.com is...  I really want to get away from desiging for 800x and use 1024x as my baseline</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">Thanks for this post!  All i&#8217;ve seen to date are stats from technology heavy sites, thus the users are probably more likely to have a high resolution and another browser besides IE.  I&#8217;d like to see what the avg screen resolution on colts.com is&#8230;  I really want to get away from desiging for 800x and use 1024x as my baseline</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PC Hardware Guy</title>
		<link>http://marketingtechblog.com/2007/08/27/follow-up-on-browser-market-share-from-coltscom/comment-page-1/#comment-55447</link>
		<dc:creator>PC Hardware Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 01:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingtechblog.com/2007/08/27/follow-up-on-browser-market-share-from-coltscom/#comment-55447</guid>
		<description>Computer geeks definately use Firefox more than the average shmoe. I use both. I only use IE now cuz I'm accustomed to it, but I am slowly moving more towards Firefox. Especially lately after getting hit by malware twice in one month while using IE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">Computer geeks definately use Firefox more than the average shmoe. I use both. I only use IE now cuz I&#8217;m accustomed to it, but I am slowly moving more towards Firefox. Especially lately after getting hit by malware twice in one month while using IE.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://marketingtechblog.com/2007/08/27/follow-up-on-browser-market-share-from-coltscom/comment-page-1/#comment-55368</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 07:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingtechblog.com/2007/08/27/follow-up-on-browser-market-share-from-coltscom/#comment-55368</guid>
		<description>Hey Doug,

I'm glad you revisited this with different stats to W3Schools, I was about to write a scathing comment on that post!

The point that has really been uncovered here is that the only stats that matter are the ones for the site you are considering at the time. If for example neither your site nor the Colts site worked in IE, the Colts would have far more problems than you. Each site has to work with it's audience and the browsers they use.

As an overall measure of browser share at the moment, just to see how Mozilla are doing, I'd like to see Google's browser stats!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">Hey Doug,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad you revisited this with different stats to W3Schools, I was about to write a scathing comment on that post!</p>
<p>The point that has really been uncovered here is that the only stats that matter are the ones for the site you are considering at the time. If for example neither your site nor the Colts site worked in IE, the Colts would have far more problems than you. Each site has to work with it&#8217;s audience and the browsers they use.</p>
<p>As an overall measure of browser share at the moment, just to see how Mozilla are doing, I&#8217;d like to see Google&#8217;s browser stats!</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas Karr</title>
		<link>http://marketingtechblog.com/2007/08/27/follow-up-on-browser-market-share-from-coltscom/comment-page-1/#comment-55243</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Karr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 11:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingtechblog.com/2007/08/27/follow-up-on-browser-market-share-from-coltscom/#comment-55243</guid>
		<description>It's interesting that that would be... but the data does provide evidence you are correct!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">It&#8217;s interesting that that would be&#8230; but the data does provide evidence you are correct!</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LA Headshot Photography</title>
		<link>http://marketingtechblog.com/2007/08/27/follow-up-on-browser-market-share-from-coltscom/comment-page-1/#comment-55221</link>
		<dc:creator>LA Headshot Photography</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 05:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingtechblog.com/2007/08/27/follow-up-on-browser-market-share-from-coltscom/#comment-55221</guid>
		<description>It seems to me that people that read blogs tend to use Firefox more. I never use Internet Explorer that much. I'm sure the general public uses it more often.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">It seems to me that people that read blogs tend to use Firefox more. I never use Internet Explorer that much. I&#8217;m sure the general public uses it more often.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
