<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GoDaddy claims trademark infringement for Go-Daddy domain purchased from GoDaddy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marketingtechblog.com/2007/08/24/godaddy-godaddy-godaddy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marketingtechblog.com/2007/08/24/godaddy-godaddy-godaddy/</link>
	<description>new media strategies and other marketing gems</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 02:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Enrico Schaefer</title>
		<link>http://marketingtechblog.com/2007/08/24/godaddy-godaddy-godaddy/comment-page-1/#comment-258271</link>
		<dc:creator>Enrico Schaefer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingtechblog.com/2007/08/24/godaddy-godaddy-godaddy/#comment-258271</guid>
		<description>Sorry guys.  It is classic cybersquatting.  There is no requirement - and indeed it would be impossible- to capture every typo, variation and extension for your trademarks.  Defensive registration may be a good idea for some of the obvious ones, but it is not required. And the Anti-Cybersquatting Act creates liability of $100,000+ for  registration on known trademarks.   Check out these resources for more info:

&lt;a href="http://tcattorney.typepad.com/domainnamedispute/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Cybersquatting &#38; Domain Trademark Blog&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">Sorry guys.  It is classic cybersquatting.  There is no requirement - and indeed it would be impossible- to capture every typo, variation and extension for your trademarks.  Defensive registration may be a good idea for some of the obvious ones, but it is not required. And the Anti-Cybersquatting Act creates liability of $100,000+ for  registration on known trademarks.   Check out these resources for more info:</p>
<p><a href="http://tcattorney.typepad.com/domainnamedispute/" rel="nofollow">Cybersquatting &amp; Domain Trademark Blog</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ka</title>
		<link>http://marketingtechblog.com/2007/08/24/godaddy-godaddy-godaddy/comment-page-1/#comment-257486</link>
		<dc:creator>ka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 17:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingtechblog.com/2007/08/24/godaddy-godaddy-godaddy/#comment-257486</guid>
		<description>I serached some good domain names and left it to buy later and Go daddy grabbed and registererd under their name. 

Thsi is day light robbery. John don't give up!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">I serached some good domain names and left it to buy later and Go daddy grabbed and registererd under their name. </p>
<p>Thsi is day light robbery. John don&#8217;t give up!!</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David McAllister</title>
		<link>http://marketingtechblog.com/2007/08/24/godaddy-godaddy-godaddy/comment-page-1/#comment-156393</link>
		<dc:creator>David McAllister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 19:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingtechblog.com/2007/08/24/godaddy-godaddy-godaddy/#comment-156393</guid>
		<description>GoDaddy has been a great business partner for several years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">GoDaddy has been a great business partner for several years.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2007 Statistics: The Marketing Technology Blog &#124; The Marketing Technology Blog</title>
		<link>http://marketingtechblog.com/2007/08/24/godaddy-godaddy-godaddy/comment-page-1/#comment-72230</link>
		<dc:creator>2007 Statistics: The Marketing Technology Blog &#124; The Marketing Technology Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 02:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingtechblog.com/2007/08/24/godaddy-godaddy-godaddy/#comment-72230</guid>
		<description>[...] GoDaddy claims Trademark Infringement on GoDaddy Domain purchased from GoDaddy: 2,804 Pageviews [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">[...] GoDaddy claims Trademark Infringement on GoDaddy Domain purchased from GoDaddy: 2,804 Pageviews [...]</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neal</title>
		<link>http://marketingtechblog.com/2007/08/24/godaddy-godaddy-godaddy/comment-page-1/#comment-61615</link>
		<dc:creator>Neal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 18:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingtechblog.com/2007/08/24/godaddy-godaddy-godaddy/#comment-61615</guid>
		<description>This is very interesting. I have owned rackdaddy.com and rackdaddy.net since 2001. both are registered with a different registrar, not GoDaddy.Com. I did sign up early this year for a GoDaddy.Com affiliate program and both domains re-direct to their servers. Essentially making GoDaddy.Com my business partner on this venture. 

Today I got a form email from GoDaddy.Com with the following in the body:

We hereby demand that you immediately: cease and desist your unauthorized use of these domains, cancel the forwarding of these domain names; and transfer the domain names to GoDaddy.com by November 16, 2007.

I am wondering what Trademark they would be referring to, as I doubt they could hardly have a Trademark on the word “Daddy”. If so every child should save up their allowance to pay for the right to say “Daddy”...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">This is very interesting. I have owned rackdaddy.com and rackdaddy.net since 2001. both are registered with a different registrar, not GoDaddy.Com. I did sign up early this year for a GoDaddy.Com affiliate program and both domains re-direct to their servers. Essentially making GoDaddy.Com my business partner on this venture. </p>
<p>Today I got a form email from GoDaddy.Com with the following in the body:</p>
<p>We hereby demand that you immediately: cease and desist your unauthorized use of these domains, cancel the forwarding of these domain names; and transfer the domain names to GoDaddy.com by November 16, 2007.</p>
<p>I am wondering what Trademark they would be referring to, as I doubt they could hardly have a Trademark on the word “Daddy”. If so every child should save up their allowance to pay for the right to say “Daddy”&#8230;</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
