<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: links for 2007-07-24</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marketingtechblog.com/2007/07/24/links-for-2007-07-24/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marketingtechblog.com/2007/07/24/links-for-2007-07-24/</link>
	<description>new media strategies and other marketing gems</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 07:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: engtech @ IDT</title>
		<link>http://marketingtechblog.com/2007/07/24/links-for-2007-07-24/comment-page-1/#comment-52214</link>
		<dc:creator>engtech @ IDT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingtechblog.com/2007/07/24/links-for-2007-07-24/#comment-52214</guid>
		<description>Yeah, Digg used to be good for secondary links because big blogs like LifeHacker would patrol digg for good stuff... but not so much anymore.

StumbleUpon... meh, never really seen it useful for anything other than traffic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">Yeah, Digg used to be good for secondary links because big blogs like LifeHacker would patrol digg for good stuff&#8230; but not so much anymore.</p>
<p>StumbleUpon&#8230; meh, never really seen it useful for anything other than traffic.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
