<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is dmoz dead?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingtechblog.com/2007/02/14/is-dmoz-dead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingtechblog.com/2007/02/14/is-dmoz-dead/</link>
	<description>new media strategies and other marketing gems</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingtechblog.com/2007/02/14/is-dmoz-dead/#comment-213945</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 05:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.douglaskarr.com/2007/02/14/is-dmoz-dead/#comment-213945</guid>
		<description>Yes DMOZ is dead long back. Google giving importance to DMOZ is no longer required.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">Yes DMOZ is dead long back. Google giving importance to DMOZ is no longer required.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingtechblog.com/2007/02/14/is-dmoz-dead/#comment-92220</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 01:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.douglaskarr.com/2007/02/14/is-dmoz-dead/#comment-92220</guid>
		<description>dmoz is dead. useless, worthless and an utter waste of time. I spoke with one of the editors back in the day who confirmed this</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">dmoz is dead. useless, worthless and an utter waste of time. I spoke with one of the editors back in the day who confirmed this</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CVOS</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingtechblog.com/2007/02/14/is-dmoz-dead/#comment-32676</link>
		<dc:creator>CVOS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.douglaskarr.com/2007/02/14/is-dmoz-dead/#comment-32676</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://add.yahoo.com/fast/add?37682891" rel="nofollow"&gt;Yahoo Submission&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><a href="http://add.yahoo.com/fast/add?37682891" rel="nofollow">Yahoo Submission</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agustin</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingtechblog.com/2007/02/14/is-dmoz-dead/#comment-32664</link>
		<dc:creator>Agustin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 20:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.douglaskarr.com/2007/02/14/is-dmoz-dead/#comment-32664</guid>
		<description>DMOZ was a great idea in 1996!  Now new sites are appearing so fast, that DMOZ can't keep up.  Additionally site submission and editor access were down and inaccessible for about 6 months!

Its a great snapshot of what were important and relevant sites years ago, but it has become a dinosaur in terms of usability.  I doubt google, Yahoo or MSN, are stupid enough to still consider a listing in the dmoz as a highly important attribute to the quality of a site.  

Its time to move on to more advanced projects on the web.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">DMOZ was a great idea in 1996!  Now new sites are appearing so fast, that DMOZ can&#8217;t keep up.  Additionally site submission and editor access were down and inaccessible for about 6 months!</p>
<p>Its a great snapshot of what were important and relevant sites years ago, but it has become a dinosaur in terms of usability.  I doubt google, Yahoo or MSN, are stupid enough to still consider a listing in the dmoz as a highly important attribute to the quality of a site.  </p>
<p>Its time to move on to more advanced projects on the web.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas Karr</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingtechblog.com/2007/02/14/is-dmoz-dead/#comment-32640</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Karr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.douglaskarr.com/2007/02/14/is-dmoz-dead/#comment-32640</guid>
		<description>CVOS, do you have a link to the Yahoo! Directory listing?  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">CVOS, do you have a link to the Yahoo! Directory listing?  Thanks!</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
