<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nielsen Comparing Apples to Oranges, Podcasting to Blogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marketingtechblog.com/2006/07/13/nielsen-comparing-apples-to-oranges-podcasting-to-blogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marketingtechblog.com/2006/07/13/nielsen-comparing-apples-to-oranges-podcasting-to-blogging/</link>
	<description>new media strategies and other marketing gems</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Douglas Karr</title>
		<link>http://marketingtechblog.com/2006/07/13/nielsen-comparing-apples-to-oranges-podcasting-to-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-36171</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Karr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 11:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingtechblog.com/?p=98#comment-36171</guid>
		<description>Hi Neal,

There's a link to the &lt;a href="http://www.clickz.com/news/article.php/3619616" rel="nofollow"&gt;Nielsen&lt;/a&gt; article in the post.  Here's an excerpt: "More people have downloaded a podcast lately than have published a blog or engage in online dating, according to a new study by Nielsen//NetRatings."

I stand by the apples to oranges... it's quite a useless comparison.  I do appreciate you stopping by and commenting, though!  I'm sure you'll find a ton more terrible comparisons on my site than Nielsen.  :)

Warmest Regards,
Doug</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">Hi Neal,</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a link to the <a href="http://www.clickz.com/news/article.php/3619616" rel="nofollow">Nielsen</a> article in the post.  Here&#8217;s an excerpt: &#8220;More people have downloaded a podcast lately than have published a blog or engage in online dating, according to a new study by Nielsen//NetRatings.&#8221;</p>
<p>I stand by the apples to oranges&#8230; it&#8217;s quite a useless comparison.  I do appreciate you stopping by and commenting, though!  I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ll find a ton more terrible comparisons on my site than Nielsen.  <img src='http://marketingtechblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Warmest Regards,<br />
Doug</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neal G Moore</title>
		<link>http://marketingtechblog.com/2006/07/13/nielsen-comparing-apples-to-oranges-podcasting-to-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-36160</link>
		<dc:creator>Neal G Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 09:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingtechblog.com/?p=98#comment-36160</guid>
		<description>I think a point of clarification is needed regarding your apples-to-oranges comment.  Yes, while &lt;i&gt;listeners&lt;/i&gt; to podcasts are consumers, and &lt;i&gt;writers&lt;i&gt; of blogs are producers, is it not also true that the &lt;i&gt;creators&lt;/i&gt; of podcasts are producers?  If this logic is valid (and I certainly think it is) then A Nielsen comparison based on different kinds of producers, or different kinds of consumers seems appropriate.  I concede that I've not seen the Nielsen research to which you made reference, but I suspect their comparison was not as disconnected as you suggest.  Yes, the mainstream media often do not get it when it comes to Web-delivered content, but I think in this instance your criticism is overly harsh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">I think a point of clarification is needed regarding your apples-to-oranges comment.  Yes, while <i>listeners</i> to podcasts are consumers, and <i>writers</i><i> of blogs are producers, is it not also true that the </i><i>creators</i> of podcasts are producers?  If this logic is valid (and I certainly think it is) then A Nielsen comparison based on different kinds of producers, or different kinds of consumers seems appropriate.  I concede that I&#8217;ve not seen the Nielsen research to which you made reference, but I suspect their comparison was not as disconnected as you suggest.  Yes, the mainstream media often do not get it when it comes to Web-delivered content, but I think in this instance your criticism is overly harsh.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
